Bond Market Overplaying Risk of Deep Recession

NEW YORK: When banks started going belly up, the reaction in bonds was emphatic. Two-year treasury yields slid a percentage point over three days in March, the most since 1982.
For traders accustomed to treating such signals as sacrosanct, the message was obvious. Gone were the days when inflation was their main menace.
Rates showed that stress in the financial system made a recession inevitable.
Or did they? Three weeks later, questions won’t stop swirling about what to make of fixed-income volatility, which for all its ferociousness remains mostly absent in equities and credit.
Explaining the divide has become a Wall Street obsession, an urgent one given the sway the Treasury holds in models designed to divine the future of inflation and US Federal Reserve (Fed) policy.

One concern is whether things having nothing to do with the economy, specifically bearish positioning among speculators, made the big drop in yield a recessionary false alarm.
“Each day that there isn’t a banking crisis is another day indicating that the current pricing doesn’t make sense, but it’s going to take a while,” said Bob Elliott, a chief investment officer at Unlimited Funds who worked for Bridgewater Associates for 13 years.
As usual in markets, the debate is far from settled, and the lurch in yields may end up being what it usually is: a grim signal for the future of the economy.
While there are oases of calm at present, the stocks themselves are a long way from sounding the all-clear.
Their big declines last year and the dominance of mega-cap technology shares atop the 2023 leaderboard can be viewed as portents of trouble. Similar wrinkles exist in corporate credit.

Still, the gap in market reactions to March’s events continues to border on the historic.
The stock market, usually an arena for shoot-first speculators whose grasp of big-picture meanings can be tenuous, absorbed Silicon Valley Bank’s (SVB) downfall and the contagion fears that followed with relative ease.
In credit, blue-chip and high-yield spreads never got wider than the levels seen last fall.
Meanwhile, daily fluctuations in two-year treasury yields erupted last month into the widest in 40 years.
The MOVE Index, which tracks expected swings in treasuries as measured by one-month options, climbed in mid-March to its highest since 2008, opening the biggest gap between stock and bond volatility in 15 years as well.
 

"The market is extremely illiquid. What this reminds me of is the 2008 and 2009 illiquidity in the bond markets. It's kind of similar. You cannot afford to get stuck in a bad position."
Vineer Bhansali

Even after things calmed a bit, the gauge remained more than double its average over the past decade.
In normal times, such violent repricing would be one of the strongest signals markets could send that a recession is at hand.
Right now, the interpretation is less obvious, according to Bespoke Investment Group’s George Pearkes.
“The treasury market isn’t trading every moment in pure fear mode, but that doesn’t mean that what’s currently in the price is some sort of prescient, ‘This is how to think about it’ signal,” said Pearkes, the firm’s global macro strategist.
“Rates are way too low. We haven’t seen signs of a broader metastasising into credit markets, into the broader banking sector, of the deposit flight story other than a few regional banks.”

Phrased differently: “The bond market has gone berserk,” said Dominique Dwor-Frecaut, a senior market strategist at the research firm Macro Hive Ltd, who previously worked in the New York Fed’s markets group.
“For once, I’m on the side of the equity markets. I don’t see a recession coming.”
Any suggestion stock jockeys had a better handle on the events of the last month will rankle the fixed-income set, long viewed as the smarter money among asset classes.
But positioning data supports the view. Equity hedge funds spent nine weeks prior to the SVB blowup trimming bank shares, and, on balance, long exposure among asset managers was near the lowest level in a decade after the drubbings of last year.
Meanwhile, the US$24 trillion (RM106 trillion) treasury markets set up in early March left bond traders vulnerable.


Citigroup Inc models and Commodity Futures Trading Commission data showed that bets against two-year treasuries had climbed to record levels ahead of the sudden collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, thrashing hedge funds and speculators as markets dramatically recalibrated Fed expectations.
Of course, less than a month after the failure of three banks and the government-sponsored bailout of a fourth in Europe, it’s too early for optimism, even as Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the system was showing signs of stabilisation.
Harley Bassman, the former Merrill managing director who created the MOVE index in 1994, said it’s not unusual for the VIX – the equity volatility benchmark – and the MOVE to flash different signals, but history shows it doesn’t last.
“It’s just a matter of time until the VIX picks up,” said Bassman, who’s a managing partner at Simplify Asset Management Inc.
“Over the past 30 years, we’ve seen a large correlation between the shape of the yield curve, credit spreads, and implied volatility, and by that, I mean all the volatility measures, including the VIX and MOVE.

The whole pack of risk metrics is very correlated over the long term.”
Short-covering in bonds was made more painful by strained trading conditions. After deteriorating for months, already thin liquidity worsened in the bond market amid the chaos.
The violence even prompted a rare trading halt in a key corner of the rate market as volatility surged, exacerbating the price swings.
“The market is extremely illiquid. What this reminds me of is the 2008 and 2009 illiquidity in the bond markets. It’s kind of similar. You cannot afford to get stuck in a bad position,” said Vineer Bhansali, founder of LongTail Alpha LLC and former head of analytics for portfolio management at Pacific Investment Management Co.
“The treasury market is a roach motel right now. You can get in, but you can’t get out. So be very careful.”

That rush for the exits has left a gaping mark on the charts even as volatility subsides.
Though a semblance of normal price action has returned in recent days, two-year treasury yields are more than a full percentage point lower than where they were when they entered March.
Yields are still languishing near levels reached in the aftermath of SVB’s implosion, even as bond traders ease up on the most dramatic pricing for Fed rate cuts.
But after such a violent flush-out, the question becomes: which managers are willing to step in and short the bond market again?
In fact, investors have flocked to the opposite side of that trade.

Data from Citi showed that speculators have largely covered their shorts on front-end bonds, while positioning has flipped into bullish territory on some parts of the curve.
The large dislocations between treasuries and stocks and credit could take months to heal as macromanagers “lick their wounds”, according to Unlimited’s Elliott.
But as concern over the health of the banking industry continues to ebb, it’ll become more and more tempting to step in. — Bloomberg

Source: Bond market overplaying risk of deep recession (2023, 11 April). STARBIZ: Foreign News pg 15, . Retrieved from The Star Newspaper​​​​​​

Disclaimer

The information provided in this report is of a general nature and has been prepared for information purposes only. It is not intended to constitute research or as advice for any investor. The information in this report is not and should not be construed or considered as an offer, recommendation or solicitation for investments. Investors are advised to make their own independent evaluation of the information contained in this report, consider their own individual investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs and should seek appropriate personalised financial advice from a qualified professional to suit individual circumstances and risk profile.
The information contained in this report is prepared from data believed to be correct and reliable at the time of issuance of this report. While every effort is made to ensure the information is up-to-date and correct, Bond and Sukuk Information Platform Sdn Bhd (“the Company”) does not make any guarantee, representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness, reliability or fairness of any such information contained in this report and accordingly, neither the Company nor any of its affiliates nor its related persons shall not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any consequences (including but not limited to any direct, indirect or consequential losses, loss of profits and damages) of any reliance thereon or usage thereof.