BIX ARTICLE
China ask brokers to pause real-world asset business in Hong Kong — Reuters
Sep 23, 2025
|
5 min read
Featured Posts
SRI Sukuk: The Journey Towards Sustainable and Responsible Investment
Jul 23, 2020
|
5 min read
Securities Commission's Capital Market Masterplan 3 (CMP3)
Sep 21, 2021
|
2 min read
What If We Allowed Retail Investors to Directly Invest in Malaysia’s Government Bond?
Aug 24, 2021
|
8 min read
Islamic Bonds Come Under Microscope After Garuda Indonesia Default
Aug 19, 2021
|
8 min read
(Sept 22): China's securities watchdog has advised some local brokerages to pause their real-world asset (RWA) tokenisation business in Hong Kong, said two sources, signalling Beijing's concerns of a euphoric drive towards a booming digital assets market offshore.
The RWA tokenisation process usually converts traditional assets such as stocks, bonds, funds and even real estate, into digital tokens traded on a blockchain. A raft of Chinese firms, including brokerages, have launched RWAs in Hong Kong over the past few months.
At least two leading brokerages have received informal guidance from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) in recent weeks to refrain from conducting RWA business offshore, said the sources with knowledge of the matter.
One of the sources said the latest regulatory guidance is aimed at strengthening risk management of a new business and making sure the claims made by companies are backed by strong, legitimate businesses.
The move comes as Hong Kong over the past year ramped up efforts to position the Asian financial centre as a digital assets hub, with many firms, including Chinese brokerages, preparing for the launch of virtual asset trading, investment advisory and virtual asset management.
China, once the world's biggest bitcoin trading and mining centre, on the other hand, has taken a cautious approach towards digital assets after it banned cryptocurrency trading and mining in 2021 due to financial system stability concerns.
Last month, Chinese regulators asked big local brokers to halt publication of research endorsing stablecoins in a bid to curb a surge in interest in the digital currency among domestic investors, Reuters has reported, citing sources.
Beijing's latest move comes even as Hong Kong said in June its Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) are conducting a legal review of RWA tokenisation, drawing on international experience.
The global RWA market is currently worth around US$29 billion (RM122 billion), according to data provider RWA.xyz. China Merchants Securities, citing industry forecasts, said last month the figure could exceed US$2 trillion by 2030.
It was not immediately known how long the Chinese securities regulator's informal guidance to some brokerages on halting RWA business in Hong Kong would remain in force. The sources could not be named as they were not authorised to speak to the media.
The CSRC, HKMA, and FSTB did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment. The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong declined to comment.
Virtual asset frenzy
Chinese brokerage GF Securities' Hong Kong unit in June launched "GF tokens", a suite of yield-generating products that are backed by the prices of US dollar, Hong Kong dollar and offshore renminbi, its partner HashKey Chain said at that time.
China Merchant Bank International, a subsidiary of China Merchant Bank, last month assisted Shenzhen Futian Investment to raise 500 million yuan via the issuance of a RWA-based digital bond, CMBI has said in a statement.
Spokespersons at GF and CMBI did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment on whether they have received any regulatory guidance on their RWA plans.
Besides brokerages, Chinese property developer Seazen Group also said last month it was setting up an institute in Hong Kong to push RWA tokenisation.
Hong Kong's recent introduction of its stablecoin regime has fuelled a wave of crypto enthusiasm. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) said earlier this month 77 firms have expressed interest in applying for a license as of Aug 31.
Shares in Chinese companies, which expressed an interest in foraying into virtual asset business — a wider sector that covers trading and investments of digital assets, stablecoin and tokenisation in Hong Kong, have rallied in the recent past.
State-owned Guotai Junan International shares once shot up more than 400% after the broker said that it had obtained regulatory approval in Hong Kong to offer cryptocurrency trading services in June.
Shares of Fosun International jumped as much as 28% on Aug 12 on the news that its chairman Guo Guangchang, together with Fosun's stablecoin team, met with top Hong Kong government officials earlier in the month.
Uploaded by Magessan Varatharaja
Disclaimer
The information provided in this report is of a general nature and has been prepared for information purposes only. It is not intended to constitute research or as advice for any investor. The information in this report is not and should not be construed or considered as an offer, recommendation or solicitation for investments. Investors are advised to make their own independent evaluation of the information contained in this report, consider their own individual investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs and should seek appropriate personalised financial advice from a qualified professional to suit individual circumstances and risk profile. The information contained in this report is prepared from data believed to be correct and reliable at the time of issuance of this report. While every effort is made to ensure the information is up-to-date and correct, Bond and Sukuk Information Platform Sdn Bhd (“the Company”) does not make any guarantee, representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness, reliability or fairness of any such information contained in this report and accordingly, neither the Company nor any of its affiliates nor its related persons shall not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any consequences (including but not limited to any direct, indirect or consequential losses, loss of profits and damages) of any reliance thereon or usage thereof.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
ARTICLE
Sep 23, 2025
|
5 min read
ARTICLE
Sep 22, 2025
|
3 min read
ARTICLE
Sep 09, 2025
|
6 min read
ARTICLE
Sep 08, 2025
|
6 min read