BIX ARTICLE
Here’s proof the Fed need not fear a world of tokens
May 21, 2025
|
6 min read
Featured Posts
SRI Sukuk: The Journey Towards Sustainable and Responsible Investment
Jul 23, 2020
|
5 min read
Securities Commission's Capital Market Masterplan 3 (CMP3)
Sep 21, 2021
|
2 min read
What If We Allowed Retail Investors to Directly Invest in Malaysia’s Government Bond?
Aug 24, 2021
|
8 min read
Islamic Bonds Come Under Microscope After Garuda Indonesia Default
Aug 19, 2021
|
8 min read
 Although only a tiny fraction of financial transactions are tokenised in the sense used in the report, the technique is growing rapidly. — Bloomberg |
A NEW report demonstrating that central banks can port their monetary policy tools into a tokenised financial system is an important step in transforming how we trade securities including stocks and bonds.
There’s never been a shortage of cryptophiles saying, “Of course central banks can run monetary policy with tokens,” nor of conservative bankers saying, “I’ll believe it when I see it.”
The report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the Federal Reserve (Fed) Bank of New York is not just one more opinion added to the mix, the authors actually built the necessary tools and tested them in 10 financial stress environments.
Although only a tiny fraction of financial transactions are tokenised in the sense used in the report, the technique is growing rapidly.
For example, JPMorgan Chase & Co recently announced it had settled a tokenised US Treasury transaction.
It’s hard to put figures on the dollar value of tokenised transactions because definitions are fuzzy and not all transactions are disclosed publicly.
But it is plausible that much of the financial settlement system will move to tokens in the next few years, and central banks must be ready.
Tokenisation as a concept is simple and ancient. Replace an asset with a token that is easier to transport and trade.
Consider the difference between an airline ticket and a ticket to a baseball game. The baseball ticket is a token. If you have it – whether on paper or in electronic form – you can enter the stadium and take a specific seat for a specific game.
You can give or sell it to anyone. The ticket is the asset – the right to sit in the seat for the game.
Airline tickets are different. You have to buy it from the airline or an authorised intermediary.
You can’t give it away or sell it. It doesn’t give you the right to occupy a specific seat on a specific flight, it’s only a reservation to get a boarding pass 24 hours before the flight, subject to modification or cancellation by the airline.
Tokens are quick and easy to transfer. Tokenised financial securities could be traded and settled in milliseconds, like handing someone cash and getting a baseball ticket.
That’s one major reason many people want to replace stocks and bonds with tokens. Settling security transactions today takes a day or longer, and there are many errors and reconciliation issues.
If you buy a stock or bond in your brokerage account, lots of databases of intermediaries have to be updated in a complex cascade of information.
Harder to control
By the same token (sorry), tokens are harder to control, which is a concern for central banks and other regulators.
A baseball team only knows who was the first purchaser of a ticket, not who is going to present it at the gate.
Airlines can charge every flyer a different price and give different service terms – such as upgrades, boarding priority and baggage fees – and know that the person for whom the ticket was purchased is the person who can use it.
Today central banks exercise their monetary tools – borrowing and lending reserves, doing repos and reverse repos, lending at the discount window, etc – through intermediaries such as banks and dealers.
If financial transactions bypass these intermediaries because one end investor transfers a token to another end investor without telling anyone else, central banks need new tools.
An important difference between baseball tickets and tokenised financial instruments is baseball tickets do not pay dividends or interest, nor take other actions.
Tokenised financial instruments are dynamic. They are governed by smart contracts that can automatically transfer money and take other actions.
Central bank tools to influence things such as interest rates, liquidity and money supply will need to be smart contracts as well. Another important difference is all baseball tickets exist in a single database.
When your ticket is scanned at the gate, the system only needs to check in one place to verify it is a valid ticket and has not been used previously.
Crosschain settlements
But financial tokens exist on different ledgers so settlement has to be cross-chain.
The money to pay for a token will generally be in a different ledger from the token, so the smart contract will need bridges to bring both ledgers into alignment.
The complex technical issues for tokenised financial systems have been quietly worked out by crypto developers while most of the world was obsessing over the ups and downs of bitcoin, meme coins and various industry scandals.
It’s part of the massive software infrastructure built with money invested in crypto.
So central bank interventions using smart contracts, such as the one built by the BIS and New York Fed, did not require technical innovation.
What no one really knew for sure before the report was how lots of different smart contracts among private individuals would interact with central bank smart contracts designed to keep financial markets liquid and efficient, protect financial institutions from excessive shocks and run the economy at capacity without overheating or slacking resources.
Would many computers all over the world running many smart contracts making transactions in milliseconds operate as designed?
Or would some kind of self-reinforcing “flash crash” blow everything up?
We now have a thorough answer from extensive stress simulations. Of course, that’s not as good as practical demonstration in a real financial crisis.
However, since we know that the existing financial system has its flash crashes and other disruptions, and central bank tools are less effective than we would like in crises, successful simulations seem like a good reason to move ahead with financial tokenisation and for central banks to build the infrastructure to deal with it. — Bloomberg
Aaron Brown is a former head of financial market research at AQR Capital Management. The views expressed here are the writer’s own.
Disclaimer
The information provided in this report is of a general nature and has been prepared for information purposes only. It is not intended to constitute research or as advice for any investor. The information in this report is not and should not be construed or considered as an offer, recommendation or solicitation for investments. Investors are advised to make their own independent evaluation of the information contained in this report, consider their own individual investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs and should seek appropriate personalised financial advice from a qualified professional to suit individual circumstances and risk profile. The information contained in this report is prepared from data believed to be correct and reliable at the time of issuance of this report. While every effort is made to ensure the information is up-to-date and correct, Bond and Sukuk Information Platform Sdn Bhd (“the Company”) does not make any guarantee, representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness, reliability or fairness of any such information contained in this report and accordingly, neither the Company nor any of its affiliates nor its related persons shall not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any consequences (including but not limited to any direct, indirect or consequential losses, loss of profits and damages) of any reliance thereon or usage thereof.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
ARTICLE
May 21, 2025
|
6 min read
ARTICLE
May 17, 2025
|
3 min read
ARTICLE
May 16, 2025
|
6 min read
ARTICLE
May 02, 2025
|
4 min read