BIX ARTICLE

Are Treasuries a sustainable bet?


Featured Posts

Social Bonds Illustrative Use-Of-Proceeds Case Studies Coronavirus

Jul 06, 2020

|

2 min read

Sustainable Banking Network (SBN) Creating Green Bond Markets

Jul 06, 2020

|

2 min read

Why is Inflation Making a Big Comeback After Being Absent for Decades in the U.S.?

Mar 24, 2022

|

7 min read

SC issues Corporate Governance Strategic Priorities 2021-2023

Mar 29, 2022

|

3 min read

Malaysian crypto push needs more than coins
 
TO many, the strategy would be unthinkable. But for almost two decades, a US$60bil wealth manager in Belgium has been shunning US Treasuries.

Degroof Petercam Asset Management (DPAM) says Treasuries aren’t good enough for its flagship sustainable government bond fund because the United States doesn’t score well enough on metrics like equality and democracy.

More recently, however, what started as a niche strategy in a single fund has spilled into other parts of DPAM.

And this time the concern isn’t sustainability, it’s the fear of financial losses.

The decision to cut Treasuries from other parts of the wealth manager’s portfolio is based “more on valuation than anything else”, says Ophelie Mortier, DPAM’s chief sustainability officer.

Mortier, a 15-year veteran of sustainable investing, has declined to provide details of how much the wealth manager has sold, citing compliance concerns. But she says she thinks it is probably a good move to cut back on Treasuries “in terms of valuation”.

DPAM, which is majority-owned by France’s Credit Agricole SA, is the latest northern European investor to raise concerns over US government bonds as everything from fiscal bloat, to tariffs, and an erratic governance style in the White House leave their mark.

Though such moves are a mere drop in the ocean in the context of the US$30 trillion US government bond market, they’ve managed on occasion to catch the attention of top-level US cabinet members.

In January, a little known pension fund based in Denmark – AkademikerPension – moved the market after letting it be known it was exiting a Treasury portfolio worth just US$100mil.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who was attending the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos at the time, sought to downplay the moment. “Denmark’s investments in Treasury bonds, like Denmark itself, is irrelevant,” he told reporters.

Anders Schelde, chief investment officer of AkademikerPension, frames the decision to exit in the context of policies being pushed by the White House, adding that the move applies only to US government bonds, not other American assets. He also says the fund is keen to prioritise European assets.

“We are not de-selecting other US markets,” Schelde tells Bloomberg. “But we will try to select European investments more often, particularly with equities – both listed and unlisted – and critical sectors like energy, defence and the digital autonomy.”

Other institutional investors to have retreated from the US government bond market include Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP, Europe’s biggest pension fund with about 540bil (US$622bil) in assets. It said in January it had cut its holdings of Treasuries by about 10bil last year to 19bil.

US bonds have served as a safe haven through most financial crises. But there are signs that European investors beyond just a handful of pension and wealth managers may be revisiting that assumption.

According to data compiled for Bloomberg by Morningstar Direct, government bond funds that are domiciled in Europe and focused on US dollar-denominated strategies saw net outflows in 2025 and 2024, which was the first year for such redemptions since 2013.

That speaks to a disconnect between how money managers on either side of the Atlantic are reading the current moment, with the Iran war adding to the growing sense of European unease.

At DPAM, countries whose bonds made it into the sustainable government bond fund include Spain as well as northern European issuers such as Denmark and the Netherlands. Countries that, like the United States, didn’t make the cut include Mexico and Colombia.

It’s “the usual suspects” that do well on sustainability criteria, says Mortier. And while US government bonds “never achieve the minimum level to be eligible”, she says this “should not be interpreted as an anti‑United States stance”.

The strategy has come at a financial cost. Since its inception in 2008, the DPAM L-Bonds Government Sustainable fund, which manages around 750mil, has delivered a total return of about 38%, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Over the same period, the Bloomberg US Treasury Total Return Index has added roughly 53%, while the Bloomberg EM Local Currency Government TR Index is up about 62%.

Mortier says the sustainability fund is “positioned as a high-quality, prudent portfolio” intended to address risk rather than generate benchmark-beating returns.

DPAM looks at sustainability criteria for all 38 members of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and so far, the United States has consistently hovered in the lower 50% of issuers, Mortier says.

In the wealth manager’s latest update of its proprietary sustainable country model, the United States has even dropped five notches to 34th place.

America has long distinguished itself from many European countries through its decision not to ratify a number of international treaties.

For example, it’s not a party to the International Criminal Court, the Ottawa Convention that seeks to ban anti-personnel landmines, or the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

What’s more, income inequality – measured using the Gini coefficient – is considerably higher in the United States than in northern European countries on average.

When it comes to ranking countries with the greatest risk of strikes, riots and civil commotion (SRCC), the United States is the No 1 Western democracy, and overall it sits at No 5, putting it ahead of Pakistan, Bangladesh and India, according to first-quarter data provided by Verisk Maplecroft.

SRCC models take into account not just the risk of unrest, but also the cost of replacing property that has been damaged.

In DPAM’s ranking of OECD issuers, the United States is ahead on technology, education and even environmental innovation. But those strengths “are offset by persistent deficits in social equity and governance performance”, Mortier says.

For example, the country’s unequal access to medical care means it ranks second lowest on government-provided healthcare, with Mexico the only country to have a worse score.

All in all, the United States “presents an imbalanced sustainability profile” with an economy that has a “high innovation capacity and global influence”, but that “underperforms in key environmental, social and governance dimensions”, she says. — Bloomberg



 
Source: Are Treasuries a sustainable bet? (Saturday, 21 Mar 2026). The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2026/03/21/are-treasuries-a-sustainable-bet
 

 
Disclaimer
The information provided in this report is of a general nature and has been prepared for information purposes only. It is not intended to constitute research or as advice for any investor. The information in this report is not and should not be construed or considered as an offer, recommendation or solicitation for investments. Investors are advised to make their own independent evaluation of the information contained in this report, consider their own individual investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs and should seek appropriate personalised financial advice from a qualified professional to suit individual circumstances and risk profile. The information contained in this report is prepared from data believed to be correct and reliable at the time of issuance of this report. While every effort is made to ensure the information is up-to-date and correct, Bond and Sukuk Information Platform Sdn Bhd (“the Company”) does not make any guarantee, representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness, reliability or fairness of any such information contained in this report and accordingly, neither the Company nor any of its affiliates nor its related persons shall not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any consequences (including but not limited to any direct, indirect or consequential losses, loss of profits and damages) of any reliance thereon or usage thereof.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

TUTORIAL

Sukuk, a steady ship

Mar 21, 2026

|

6 min read